NASA’s Revolutionary ‘Propulsion System’ can get Astronauts to Mars in 39 days

According to reports, a company from Texas has been chosen by NASA to develop a ground-breaking engine that could send Humans to Mars in less than 40 days. Ad Astra's Vasimr engine is seemingly able of get a spacecraft to Mars in 39 days. This project is just one of the twelve projects presently funded by NASA. 

Among the revolutionary propulsion system, there are other technologies at present in development; among them are improved habits for humans and smaller satellites that could search space more proficiently.

Vasimr is short for Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket.

Remember, there is a long way to go here since Ad Astra’s Vasimr engine is just one part of the complete spacecraft that could ultimately take astronauts to Mars. Researchers still require to figure out the type of spacecraft astronauts would travel in.

The revolutionary engine uses plasma as a propellant and is developed by Texas based company Ad Astra. The engine hit the headlines a couple of years ago when sources showed that this groundbreaking engine could decrease the trip to Mars from months to weeks. The only downside if there is one is that the engine needs a Nuclear power source.

In 2013, the company finished the testing of the first prototype.

"We are thrilled by this declaration and proud to be joining forces with NASA in the final phases of the technology maturation. We look forward to a very fruitful partnership as we together advance the technology to flight readiness." said Dr Franklin Chang Diaz, Ad Astra’s Chairman and CEO, in a statement.

This is just one of the many technologies presently in development that will let NASA to explore and colonize space in a much more efficient manner.  ‘Commercial partners were chosen for their technical capability of maturing key technologies and their commitment to the potential applications both for government and private sector uses,’ said William Gerstenmaier, assistant administrator for Human Exploration and Operations at NASA Headquarters.

‘This work eventually will inform the strategy to move human existence further into the solar system.’

Ad Astra


Journey To Mars


Space Exploration

Post A Comment:


  1. A nuclear power source is the downside? With all the solar radiation inundating them (the astronauts), what's a few dozen more Roentgens? The nuclear power source will be better shielded than the rest of the entire craft anyway.

    1. The partial nuclear test ban for one

  2. N.A.S.A.,needs to look at the Em-Drive engine.

  3. I agreed with GD&W, we need to get over our aversion to nuclear power in space. We have nuclear submarines and surface ships because it is the cleanest, lightest, most sensible power source for a large vehicle. Spacecraft are no exception; if we want to get around the solar system in a reasonable time, we need more power, and that means nuclear.

  4. The only real scare is that sometimes during liftoff every blue moon rockets still blow-up. Naturally we don't want "any" chance the radioactive core could be exposed. So technologically we need a casing that can not be ruptured even in a high powered rocket explosion. That's not easy... but not impossible.

  5. if we want to get around the solar system in a reasonable time,thank you,
    online baccarat