Advertisement

A
physical object, such as a person or a spacecraft, could theoretically make it
through a wormhole in the centre of a black hole, and maybe even access another
universe on the other side, physicists have suggested.

In
what looks like the logical extension of the plot of Interstellar - where
astronauts try to hunt down another universe after the catastrophic effects of
climate change destroy Earth - physicists have modelled what would happen to a
chair, a scientist, and a spacecraft, if each one ended up inside the spherical
wormhole of a black hole.

"What
we did was to reconsider a fundamental question on the relation between the
gravity and the underlying structure of space-time, In practical terms, we dropped one assumption that holds in general relativity, but there is no a priori reason for it to hold in extensions of this theory." said one of the team,
Diego Rubiera-Garcia from the University of Lisbon in Portugal.

So
let’s take a step back first, and go through some of the basics. According to
Einstein’s theory of general relativity, at the centre of a black hole lies a
singularity - the point at which the forces of gravity are at their most
intense, and time and space effectively end.

If
an object approaches the event horizon, it would be crushed in one direction,
and stretched in another, thanks to the extreme tidal forces of gravity at play
inside a black hole. If the object stays intact long enough to make it to the
centre of a black hole, it will be infinitely long and thin: basically, it’s
been spaghettified beyond recognition.

Physicists
have been playing around with the assumption of a singularity in the centre of
a black hole for years, because until we can actually prove it exists, there
could be any number of possibilities that still work - in theory.

Earlier
this year, physicists from the University of Cambridge in the UK argued that
there’s no reason why a singularity necessarily has to be on the inside of a
black hole. They suggest that in a universe with five or more dimensions -
which isn’t out of the question for us - a 'naked' singularly could exist,
which is not bound by an event horizon.

Of
course, this would mean big, huge things for our current understanding of how
the laws of physics govern our Universe, because it basically needs Einstein’s
theory of general relativity to be wrong.

"If
naked singularities exist, general relativity breaks down," said one of
the team, Saran Tunyasuvunakool, back in January. "And if general relativity
breaks down, it would throw everything upside down, because it would no longer
have any predictive power - it could no longer be considered as a standalone
theory to explain the Universe."

Einstein
being wrong isn’t out of the question, either. Stephen Hawking has been
battling for decades with the way general relativity appears to clash with
quantum mechanics in black holes - a problem known as the information
paradox.

So
assuming that the stipulations of general relativity aren’t set in stone, the
new study from Rubiera-Garcia’s team argue that if you remove singularity from
a black hole, what you get in the centre instead is a finite-sized wormhole.

Then,
they figured out what could happen if various objects - a chair, a scientist,
and a spacecraft - made it beyond the event horizon and into the wormhole.
These objects are referred to as 'observers'.

They
modelled these observers as an aggregation of points connected by physical or
chemical interactions that hold everything together as the object travels along
a geodesic line. A geodesic line is simply the path in spacetime that a
free-falling object follows.

"Each
particle of the observer follows a geodesic line determined by the
gravitational field," says Rubiera-Garcia. "Each geodesic feels a
slightly different gravitational force, but the interactions among the
constituents of the body could nonetheless sustain the body."

Publishing
in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity, the researchers demonstrate this
by showing how the time spent by a light ray in a round trip between two parts
of the body is always finite.

This
means that finite forces, no matter how strong, could compensate for the impact
of the gravitational field near and inside the wormhole on a physical body
travelling through it.

"Thus,
different parts of the body will still establish physical or chemical
interactions and, consequently, cause and effect still apply all the way across
the throat of the wormhole," they explain.

So
while the theory of general relativity predicts that an object approaching a
black hole will be crushed along one direction and stretched along another
infinitely, if we assume that the centre of a black hole is a wormhole with a
finite radius, the object can only be crushed just as much as the size of the
wormhole.

This
means according to Rubiera-Garcia's hypothesis, an object could survive a
journey through a wormhole and make it out the other side - and potentially to
another universe - technically intact, but it would be crushed to the size of
the finite wormhole. At least it’s not completely destroyed, right?

"For
a theoretical physicist, the suffering of observers is admissible (one might
even consider it part of an experimentalist’s job) but their total destruction
is not," Rubiera-Garcia and his team quip in an opinion piece.

Until
we figure out how to actually see a black hole, all of this is going to remain
well and truly in the realm of pure hypotheticals. But we're beginning to see
how black holes might not be the horrible, existence-obliterating death traps
we thought they were.

As
Hawking said at a conference back in August 2015 about his solution to the
information paradox: "The message of this lecture is that black holes
ain't as black as they are painted. They are not the eternal prisons they were
once thought. ... If you feel you are in a black hole, don’t give up. There’s a
way out."

This post was written by Usman Abrar. To contact the
writer write to iamusamn93@gmail.com.
Follow on Facebook

"If the object stays intact long enough to make it to the centre of a black hole, it will be infinitely long and thin: basically, it’s been spaghettified beyond recognition...Physicists have been playing around with the assumption of a singularity in the centre of a black hole for years, because until we can actually prove it exists, there could be any number of possibilities that still work - in theory. "

ReplyDeleteFirst the event horizon isn't just at the black hole, but it also has an outer event horizon at the outside of the black hole's jets that form an outer spherical event horizon. It looks like the Oort Cloud around our sun. At the event horizon time stops and all matter below the black hole's inner event horizon becomes quantum entangled with all other matter in the universe at the nuclear scale of protons [holes] in the semiconductor junction. At the outer event horizon something else happens; matter stops but time reflects backwards in spacetime to the here and now. We are all back from the future living in retrocausal spacetime. That's what makes time travel, warp drive propulsion and teleportation reality. Check out my US Patent Granted April 2016 on Gravitomagnetism here: http://www.gravitomag.com/#applications